[...] so it is being consumed, in the case of oil,
burned. But the consumer is incapable of controlling the consumption amount.
Consumer denial is useless as long as there is a demand for the oil at any other place
on earth. Should the consumption in Germany decrease for some reason (actually sparing
the atmosphere), then this would perhaps cause a dip in the world market demand but it
would cause a falling oil price, too. A falling oil price is inevitably followed by
a higher consumption, possibly by people using their car more often or more people
flying because of cheaper kerosene.
It doesn't matter which way consumption goes regionally or functionally. The only
important thing is the fact, that everything that has been extracted and moved to
refinieries by tankers or pipeline, will be consumed.
You cannot say it is the fault of the consumers, the USA, the car producers or anybody
else. It's solely the fault of the nation states who sell concessions and/or the nation
states who extract the oil themselves. Where is the sense in blaming the car industry,
the energy providers and the consumers who are powerless against that omnipotence?
The consumer intuitively lives according to his powerlessness.
Like the scientist Peters said: “barely anyone will alter his behaviour to reduce
greenhouse gases.”.
It doesn't work that way. If you earn money, you will spend it or save it. If you
save 500 Euros of heating costs this year, you take the “saved” money
to spend it for a christmas vacation. Or you take it to your bank, that loans it to
other consumers or investors. Those consume the energy you saved. It's a zero-sum
game.
The only solution is to reduce the quantity supplied, meaning reducing the extraction
concessions. So the oil price increases, people get less oil for their money, consumption
decreases.
End-of-pipe-measures don't generate this effect. They are useless. Concentrating on
that kind of measures, concentrating on the Kyoto protocol point of view prevents
capable and effective measures.
There is an ideological blockade responsible for this. It comes from seeing the OPEC
as a malevolent monopoly instead of a tool for protecting the environment. All nation
states should be forced into the OPEC cartel that makes them decrease the annual oil
extraction gradually over the years.